Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:25
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How come Jesus died on Friday and rose on Sunday? That's not 3 days and three nights.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
——K-Pop Songs that got boring really quickly
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Traders Scour for ‘Elusive’ Catalyst to Push S&P 500 to Record - Bloomberg
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Israel launches several attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs, south Lebanon - Al Jazeera
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The dogs of Chernobyl may be evolving right before our eyes - Boy Genius Report
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Poor appetite? What that can mean and how to get hungry again - The Washington Post
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How anorexia whittled away Carly Kempf's life - Times Union
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.